Marcus Stroman is the San Francisco Giants free-agent profile.
The San Francisco Giants made an unofficial announcement that they would not be signing Blake Snell following their trade for Robbie Ray. Although the statement was vague, it was easy to interpret what was meant to be said.
After an improbable Cy Young Award season, Snell, a client of Scott Boras, is set to receive a contract worth $200 million or more for his 2.25 ERA in 2023 rather than his anticipated ERA in 2024 and beyond. There are pitchers who carry a risk and then there’s Snell. Before the Giants lost out on Yoshinobu Yamamoto and Shohei Ohtani, it was a simple suggestion that they seek elsewhere. Snell looks better and better now that their premium options are running out. This contrasts sharply with sour grapes. This is the gift shop in Knott’s Berry Farm, where admittance to an expensive collection of jelly requires payment for entry.
Thank you very much; the Giants would like a jar from Whole Foods. Though still pricey, it’s nearly as nice and much easier to get.
We’re still discussing pitchers, I believe. I had to get off this writing before lunch.
Unlike Snell, Marcus Stroman is a right-handed starter who has made two appearances on the All-Star squad, including last year. He is not a contender for the Cy Young Award. He may be the most underappreciated pitcher of the off-season, and the Giants may find him to be a nice fit.
Why Marcus Stroman might be desired by the Giants
Here are the pitchers with the most seasons with 20+ starts and a FIP under 4.00 since Stroman entered the league in 2014:
By definition, a pitcher must have longevity in order to be included on this list, so don’t bother looking at the pitchers who aren’t. Simply take note of the company Stroman maintains when it comes to recording more than 20 starts and falling in the middle of “solid” and “good.” I don’t have an answer for your claim that the Giants require an ace. Your argument may be that they do. It turns out that winning baseball
teams benefit from having aces. However, don’t fall into the trap of believing that there is only one option. It is not win-or-lose. If it’s accessible, it’s an ace, but its effectiveness is erratic, at best, and a bust otherwise.
Leave a Reply